Categories
resource

Emotional Experiences During School Transitions

Transitions into school – particularly at reception age – are pivotal moments in a child’s development. While many children appear outwardly settled, research and case studies reveal that the emotional experience of separation can be far more complex.


Emotional Responses to Separation: What the Literature Tells Us

Children’s emotional responses to separation are often hidden beneath calm or engaged behaviour. Drawing on Bowlby’s stages of separationprotestdespair, and detachment – research shows that short-term separations can trigger intense emotional reactions. If a child’s emotional needs are not met, they may move from protest to despair, potentially impacting their ability to form attachments within the school setting.

The literature also highlights the importance of secure attachments and the role of schools in acting as a secure base. Theories such as Mahler’s separation-individuation and Winnicott’s transitional objectsunderscore how children use symbolic play and objects to navigate the emotional terrain of separation and develop a sense of individuality.


Case Studies: Observing the Hidden Layers of Separation

The case studies that Suzie explored as part of her doctoral thesis involved engaging children through play and drawing activities in order to explore their experiences of separation from their caregivers. Whilst one child showed visible distress during separation, they gradually adjusted, as reflected in their drawings and classroom engagement. Another child appeared settled but lacked peer connections and focused heavily on family themes in discussion with Suzie suggesting a desire to remain connected to home. 

These observations reinforce the idea that outward behaviour may not reflect internal emotional states, and that schools must create opportunities for children to express their feelings in safe, supportive ways.


Implications for Schools: Recognising and Responding to Emotional Needs

Educators play a crucial role in identifying children who may be struggling with separation. Signs include:

  • Withdrawal or lack of engagement
  • Difficulty forming peer or adult connections
  • Persistent emotional dysregulation throughout the day

Children who successfully transfer a sense of security from their parents to school adults and peers tend to adjust more easily. 


Practical Strategies for Supporting Transitions

To support children during transitions, schools can implement the following strategies:

1. Monitor Engagement and Emotional Well-being

  • Observe children closely during the first weeks.
  • Look for signs of connection with peers and adults.

2. Establish Predictable and Welcoming Routines

  • Use consistent handover rituals with parents.
  • Designate a familiar adult to greet each child daily.

3. Use Structured Separation Dialogues

  • Scripted exchanges between parents and staff can reassure children: 
  • “Miss Smith, are you ready to look after Johnny today?”
  • “Yes, we’ll look after him, and you’ll come back at the end of the day.”

4. Incorporate Playfulness and Transitional Objects

  • Special handshakes, goodbye routines, or comfort items can ease separation.
  • Games like peekaboo reinforce the concept of return.

5. Facilitate Emotional Expression Through Play

  • Use books, role-play, and drawing to explore themes of separation.
  • Create safe spaces for children to discuss their feelings.

6. Foster Peer Connections

  • Plan icebreakers and group activities to build relationships.
  • Prioritise emotional well-being alongside academic readiness.

Conclusion: Balancing Emotional and Academic Needs

While academic pressures are real, supporting children’s emotional adjustment during transitions is foundational to long-term success. By recognising the hidden emotional experiences of separation and implementing thoughtful strategies, educators can foster a sense of belonging and resilience in every child. This also means that children are given the tools to understand and process the loss of their attachment figure (however short term) and express their feelings verbally, instead of behaviourally. 

Categories
resource

Compassion: The Heart of Education

By Marcia Mota-Kerby, Educational Psychologist

Every day, educators are navigating social and emotional complexities, supporting children’s wellbeing, fostering inclusion, and responding to diverse needs within ever-changing contexts. Schools are not only spaces of learning but also places of safety, belonging, and emotional support for pupils and their families. Within this dynamic landscape, compassion is not an option – it is a necessity. It is an internal motivational process that can transform the school culture, restore connection, and strengthen communities from within.


What Is Compassion?

Compassion, as defined by the psychologist Paul Gilbert (2019) is “a sensitivity to suffering in self and others, with a commitment to try to alleviate and prevent it.”

It involves two key components:

  1. Engagement – noticing and tuning in to distress (in ourselves or others).
  2. Action – taking wise, supportive steps to help reduce that distress.

Unlike empathy, which focuses on recognising and connecting with another person’s emotions, compassion adds the motivation to help. It engages courage, wisdom, and emotional regulation, skills that can be developed individually and collectively.


The Flows of Compassion

In Gilbert’s model, compassion exists in three interconnected flows, each are essential for wellbeing:

  1. Compassion for Others – our ability to notice when someone else is struggling and to respond with care and understanding.
  2. Compassion from Others – our capacity to accept care and support when we are struggling.
  3. Self-Compassion – how we respond to ourselves during challenging moments, whether triggered by external events (like a specific incident), internal experiences (such as emotions, thoughts, or feelings), or a sense of personal failure. 

In a school context, these flows form a dynamic network that shapes the emotional health and wellbeing of the entire school community.

  • When teachers offer compassion to students – by listening, adapting, or holding space for mistakes – they help pupils overcome challenges, low self-confidence, shame and self-criticism, and develop trust.
  • When staff receive compassion from colleagues and leaders – through empathy, care, and shared understanding, they are better able to sustain their own wellbeing.
  • When individuals practise self-compassion, they can recover more effectively from setbacks and maintain perspective in challenging situations

A compassionate school culture nurtures all three flows, recognising that everyone, students, teachers, leaders, and families, needs both to give and receive compassion to flourish.


Why Compassion Matters in Schools

A growing body of evidence demonstrates that compassion is not merely a moral ideal but a scientifically supported approach that enhances wellbeing and learning across educational contexts. 

  • Neuroscientific research shows that compassion engages neural systems linked to soothing, caregiving, and affiliation, mechanisms that help balance the brain’s stress and threat responses (Klimecki et al., 2013; Lutz, Greischar, & Davidson, 2004). In essence, compassion activates the very systems that foster emotional regulation, safety, and connection. For schools, this has powerful implications: when both staff and pupils experience a sense of psychological safety and belonging, the conditions for learning, curiosity, creativity, and motivation naturally thrive.
  • Research by Kristin Neff (2003) and Christopher Germer (2018) shows that self-compassion reduces anxiety, promotes resilience, and helps individuals cope and recover from challenges, essential qualities in both teaching and learning. Similarly, Jennings and Greenberg (2009) found that educators who cultivate emotional awareness and compassion create classrooms with lower stress levels, better relationships, and improved student outcomes.
  • From an organisational perspective, Huppert and So (2013) identified compassion and empathy as core components of psychological wellbeing in schools, while Roeser et al. (2013) demonstrated that teachers trained in mindfulness and compassion-based practices experience less emotional exhaustion and greater professional efficacy.

Ultimately, compassion is not an “add-on”; it is the foundation of a psychologically safe, inclusive, and healthy-performing school culture.


If compassion is embedded into school life, what does this look like?

  • Classrooms that emphasise connection before correction – where behaviour is understood as communication and where mistakes are treated as learning opportunities.
  • Leadership teams that model emotional openness, support staff wellbeing, and promote shared reflection.
  • Policies and procedures grounded in fairness and understanding, balancing accountability with empathy. Compassion in education thrives when supported by clear expectations and healthy boundaries, enabling care that is empathetic, balanced, and sustainable for both staff and students.
  • Staffrooms where colleagues check in on one another, and vulnerability is met with care and kindness.
  • Children and young people who feel safe, seen, and valued.

Embedding compassion throughout school life lays the foundation for a more relational and responsive approach, one that aligns naturally with the principles of humanisation in education.


Humanisation in Education: From Systems to Relationships

To humanise school services means putting relationships, understanding, and empathy at the centre of how we work with children, families, and colleagues. It involves recognising that behaviour, emotions, learning, and wellbeing are interconnected, and that behind every challenge lies a story and a narrative that deserves to be understood.

In a compassionate school, systems are designed to support people rather than manage problems. Humanisation starts with a shift in mindset: moving from “What’s wrong with this child?” to “What’s happened to this child?”, and ultimately to “What does this person need to feel safe, connected, and ready to learn?” 

When schools embrace this approach, every layer of the organisation, from classroom practice to leadership decision-making, begins to reflect compassion in action:

  • Inclusive and relational support systems prioritise the child’s context and voice, recognising that progress depends as much on belonging and trust as on academic targets (Roffey, 2016).
  • Pastoral and behaviour policies emphasise repair over punishment, using restorative conversations and emotion coaching to help pupils learn from difficulties and build resilience (McCluskey et al., 2019).
  • Staff wellbeing structures create psychologically safe spaces for reflection, supervision, and peer support, acknowledging that educators cannot pour from an empty cup (Herman et al., 2020).
  • Partnerships with families are grounded in listening, empathy, and collaboration, strengthening community trust and shared responsibility for children’s wellbeing.
  • Leadership practices model compassion through transparency, curiosity, and care, valuing people’s emotions and experiences alongside performance indicators (Seligman, 2011; Roffey, 2021).

When services are humanised, schools evolve from systems of compliance into communities of care. Interactions become grounded in respect, acceptance, fostering trust and cooperation. In such environments, children feel safe to learn, teachers feel empowered to teach, and relationships not routines, form the heartbeat of the school.


Cultivating Compassion: A Call to Action

Cultivating compassion is not about adding another initiative to an already full plate, it is about changing the plate itself. It begins with small acts: taking a moment to listen, to pause before responding, to cultivate a non-judgmental approach, and assume positive intent. Over time, these micro-moments form the foundation of a compassionate culture.

Developing compassion is a skill. It requires intentional practice: slowing down, listening deeply, and responding with care even when time is short. Schools can nurture this through:

  • Staff training in compassion focused and values-based approaches. Building awareness of one’s own emotions and responses enables educators to remain calm, and grounded, especially under pressure. 
  • Reflective supervision and peer support. Providing regular spaces for staff to reflect on challenging situations helps normalise and validate emotional responses within an intrapersonal context, reduce isolation, and strengthen professional resilience.
  • Curriculum initiatives that teach empathy, perspective-taking, and emotional literacy. Embedding compassion-based learning into PSHE, citizenship, and pastoral care encourages students to understand and manage emotions constructively.
  • Leadership that promotes values and connection as much as compliance and outcomes.Compassionate leadership models openness, listens actively, and ensures that wellbeing is woven into school development priorities.

Compassion is courage in action. And when it flows through every level of a school, it truly becomes a superpower, one capable of transforming education from the inside out.

Categories
resource

Imagination & Autism: Insights from EP Research

Exploring Imaginary Worlds in Autistic Children and Young People

Dr Kate Boyle’s doctoral research explores how autistic children and young people (CYP) experience Imaginary Companions (ICs) and Paracosms; complex and persistent imaginary worlds.

Psychological Background

Historically, autism has been associated with impaired imagination, a view rooted in early cognitive psychology and diagnostic frameworks. Influential theories such as:

  • Theory of Mind (Baron-Cohen, 1995),
  • Social Motivation Theory (Dawson et al., 2005),
  • and Sustained Imagination Theory (Harris, 2000)

have contributed to deficit-based narratives. These theories often overlook the private, creative, and emotionally rich inner worlds of autistic CYP. Qualitative research into autistic children and young people’s imaginary friends and paracosms has never been undertaken before so it is a new and exciting area of research.

Kate’s research aligns with a growing movement in autism studies that prioritises neurodiversity, participatory methods, and strength-based approaches. Kate worked with autistic researchers for support with the design of the study which helped significantly in ensuring her participants were able to truly participate.

What Are ICs and Paracosms?

  • Imaginary Companions (ICs): Invisible friends or personified objects that have been found to support emotional regulation, creativity, and social connection in typically developing children and young people.
  • Paracosms: Elaborate, persistent imaginary worlds revisited over time, often involving storytelling, role-play, and symbolic meaning. Paracosms have not been researched much at all.

These forms of play reflect complex cognitive and emotional processes, including:

  • Self-soothing and emotional regulation
  • Perspective-taking and empathy
  • Creative problem-solving
  • Identity exploration

Key Findings from the Thesis Research

With just 8 participants we discovered over 100 ICs, 6 paracosms, and 18 personified objects.

Four core psychological themes emerged:

Control

Imaginary worlds offer predictability and autonomy which is especially important for CYP who may experience sensory or social unpredictability in daily life.

“It felt normal to me… I had control over it all.”

Connection

ICs provide companionship and reduce feelings of isolation, especially in contexts where social relationships may be challenging.

“Because I’ve got my imaginary friends, I never feel alone.”

Learning

Imaginary play mirrors real-life experiences, allowing CYP to process medical, emotional, or social situations through symbolic representation.

“I’ve got the same [medical needs]… so I help my dollies.”

Wellbeing

Imaginary worlds serve as emotional sanctuaries, helping CYP regulate anxiety, agitation, and stress.

“When I go into my imaginary world… I feel better.”


Why This Matters for Schools

Autistic CYP are often perceived as having limited imagination or creativity. This assumption can shape how we interpret their behaviour, plan interventions and engage with their interests. Kate’s research shows that:

  • Autistic CYP can engage in rich imaginative play
  • These experiences are emotionally meaningful, supporting wellbeing, learning and social connection
  • Imaginary play can be a protective factor, helping CYP manage anxiety, loneliness and unpredictability

Understanding this helps school staff:

  • Recognise imaginative play as a strength, not a symptom or deficit
  • Use imaginative content to build rapport and understand emotional needs
  • Avoid misinterpreting imaginative behaviours as signs of withdrawal or avoidance

This research reinforces a neurodiversity-affirming approach to education and psychology. Autistic CYP are not all lacking in imagination, while some may struggle in this area this research provides key evidence that some autistic CYP are able to engage in one of the most complex forms of imaginary play in childhood, suggesting significant strength in imagination rather than weakness.

 “It [my imaginary world] wasn’t unknown…I had control over it all.”

This quote from an 11-year old participant reflects how engaging with their paracosm can offer emotional safety, autonomy and empowerment – core needs for all children and especially for those navigating a neurotypical world.

Implications for Practice in Schools

This research invites educators to reframe imaginative play in autistic CYP as a strength rather than a deficit. Here’s how you can apply these insights:

  • Ask about imaginary friends/worlds during pupil voice activities or wellbeing check-ins
  • Engage with imaginative play as a window into emotional needs and coping strategies
  • Use imaginative themes to support transitions, social stories, or therapeutic interventions
  • Challenge outdated narratives about autism and creativity in staff training and policy
  • Promote inclusive research and practice by valuing CYP’s lived experiences

Final Thought

Autistic children and young people in this research have been found to engage in the most complex forms of imaginative play, yet the research base overlooks this and focuses on differences and deficits. This is indicative of a wider research and societal problem in which autistic people are studied as subjects to understand impairments and differences in relation to typically developing people. Kate’s work highlights a serious gap in research, likely related to past research not being accessible for autistic individuals, and a powerful opportunity for schools to support autistic CYP in ways that are creative, compassionate, and evidence-informed.

How Can Educational Psychologists (EPs) Support?

EPs are well-placed to support schools in applying these insights:

  • Promote strength-based approaches to autism that value creativity and individualism
  • Model inclusive pupil voice practices, using imaginative play as a tool for engagement
  • Support staff training on autism and neurodiversity-affirming language and approaches
  • Facilitate reflective spaces for staff to explore how imaginative play can inform understanding of CYP’s internal worlds
  • Design interventions that incorporate imaginative elements (e.g., narrative therapy, story-based social skills work)
  • Advocate for participatory research and practice, ensuring autistic CYP are co-creators of their support plans

Kate is in the process of getting her exciting research published in an academic journal. Please do reach out if you would like to discuss her thesis research with her and what it helped us learn. 


Interested for more?

Watch Kate speak about her research on this episode of EP Reach Out.

Categories
resource

How to Use Restorative Justice

What is Restorative Justice

If you consider the question, “What are we trying to teach young people when we discipline them?” you are likely to come up with responses like: accepting responsibility, discouraging the behaviour, developing empathy and self-regulation. 

Restorative Justice (RJ) is a relational approach to addressing harm and conflict that supports all of the answers above. Rather than focusing on punishment, RJ emphasizes repairing relationships, understanding perspectives, and restoring trust. 

A few key principles

  • The focus is on: what happened; the effect of actions and words; the consequences of behaviour.
  • The victim’s needs are considered whilst the perpetrator can repair harm without shame.
  • The move towards resolution comes from the pupils themselves.

How to Use Restorative Justice

RJ can be used in schools through a range of practices, from informal conversations to structured conferences.  Although further training is needed to carry out RJ conferences there are 5 key RJ questions that can be easily used in any situation where harm has been caused by a playground altercation to a show of defiance in the classroom: 

#1: What happened?

Example:

  • Tell me in your words what happened

#2: What were you thinking?

Examples:

  • What was going through your mind when you did this?​
  • What was the purpose of doing that?​
  • What did you think would happen? 

#3: What were you feeling?

Examples:

  • How did you feel when you did this (using an emotion wheel)?​
  • What emotions did you feel when you did this?
  • How did your body feel when you did this?

#4: Who has been affected?

Examples:

  • What do you think he/she felt?​
  • What do you think that was like for X? ​
  • Who has been hurt?​ 

#5: How can we put things right?

Examples:

  • What has changed for you hearing/thinking about how X feels
  • How can we make things better?​
  • How would you like for things to be different?
  • How can we achieve this?​
  • What will you do differently next time?​
  • Who can help you?​

What might this look like?

A child has repeatedly refused your instructions to stop pushing another student in the line.  You take this child out of the line and quietly ask the following questions, waiting for their responses.

  • Can you explain to me what just happened whilst you were standing in the line?
  • What did you think the other child would do when that happened?
  • What did you think might have happened if you carried on?
  • What emotions do you think could describe how you felt just then?  Were you excited or angry about something?
  • How do you think the other child felt as you were doing that?  What do you think that was like for them?
  • Shall we think about what we could do to make things better?
  • What could you do differently next time we line up?

Notice that this conversation doesn’t include the word ‘why’.  Often the word ‘why’ places blame at someone’s door and expects the child to explain themselves leading to a ‘he said’,  ‘she said’ scenario or a feeling of unfairness.  These questions avoid blame whilst exploring both people’s feelings.  How do you think the child would respond differently if you had used ‘why’ instead of asking these questions?


Why It Works

RJ is effective because it aligns with how young people learn and develop emotionally and socially.

  • Supports brain development and emotional regulation.
  • Encourages emotional connection and empathy.
  • Avoids a culture of fear and promotes openness.

Evidence has shown that RJ reduces exclusions, improves behaviour, and strengthens relationships.  It has also been found to support young people who act impulsively by modelling executive functioning and planning on how to approach a problematic situation. 


Does it work?

Restorative justice has a long and rich history and its creation is often attributed to Maori people in New Zealand and Indigenous people of Canada and USA.  These communities used systems based on the same values as RJ for hundreds of years to protect individual and promote social stability.  

To review the effectiveness of RJ in schools in current times a systematic review of many studies found that RJ can decrease exclusions, improved school climates, increased happiness and improved relationships between students and between students and teachers (Lodi, Perrrella, Lepri, Scarpa and Patrizi, 2021).


Implementation Tips:

  • Create safe spaces for dialogue.  Remove the CYP out of ear shot of other CYP or take them out of the classroom. 
  • Use restorative language consistently this helps CYP get used to the questions and overtime they will become better at answering them without so much prompting from you. 
  • Model respectful communication in your tone of voice, the volume, your body language and how calmly you approach the situation.
Categories
resource

Systemic Tools for Transformational Teaching

Reflective Thinking and Supervision

In education, no teacher works in isolation. Every classroom interaction, policy decision, and professional conversation is part of a larger, interconnected system. When we view teaching through a systemic lens, reflective thinking and supervision become not just personal tools for growth – but essential levers for whole-school transformation and wellbeing.

Seeing the Bigger Picture: What Is a Systemic Lens?

Systemic theory invites us to see schools as living systems – complex, dynamic, and deeply relational. Every teacher, student, leader, and policy is part of a web of influence. Change in one part of the system affects the whole.

“Like a kaleidoscope, transformational leaders must constantly shift their perspective, allowing their identity, lived experience, and theoretical understanding to create dynamic patterns of possibility.”
Ziegenfuss, Evans & Girman, 2025

With that in mind, we advocate that reflective thinking and supervision, when grounded in systemic principles, can help school staff:

  • Shift from reactive to responsive practice.
  • Understand how their actions ripple through the system.
  • Recognise patterns, not just isolated events.

Reflective Thinking as a Systemic Practice

Reflection is more than self-evaluation—it’s a curious stance towards oneself and the systems around them

“I have no special talents, I am only passionately curious”
Albert Einstein 

Teachers who reflect systemically ask:

  • How do my beliefs shape my interactions?
  • What patterns do I notice in student behaviour or outcomes?
  • How does my role connect to wider school goals or community needs?

Systemic reflection encourages teachers to move beyond individual lessons and consider:

  • Relational dynamics (e.g., power, communication, inclusion)
  • Cultural narratives (e.g., equity, identity, belonging)
  • Structural influences (e.g., policies, timetables, assessment systems)

Supervision as a Systemic Support Structure

Supervision, when viewed systemically, is not about oversight—it’s about co-creating meaning and direction.

It becomes a space where educators and leaders explore:

  • How their work aligns with the school’s mission.
  • How systemic pressures (e.g., accountability, funding, trauma) impact practice.
  • How to sustain wellbeing while navigating complexity.

“Supervision should be a conversation, not a critique.”
Stephen Gordon

Systemic supervision fosters:

  • Shared responsibility: Everyone contributes to the health of the system.
  • Collective insight: Patterns and blind spots are surfaced together.
  • Adaptive capacity: Teachers become more agile and resilient in the face of change.


Wellbeing and Burnout: A Systemic Concern

Burnout isn’t just an individual issue—it’s a systemic signal. When teachers are overwhelmed, it often reflects deeper misalignments in the system: unrealistic expectations, lack of voice, or disconnection from purpose. This can affect anyone working with the education system and especially those who care for others and hold leadership responsibility. 

Reflective practice and supervision help staff:

  • Name and normalize emotional experiences.
  • Reconnect with their values and agency.
  • Shift from isolation to interdependence.

“You can’t pour from an empty cup. Take care of yourself first.”
Unknown

Schools that embed systemic reflection and supervision report:

  • Lower burnout and attrition.
  • Stronger professional identity.
  • Greater alignment between personal and organisational value


From Reflection to Transformation

Systemic change doesn’t happen through top-down mandates—it grows from reflective, relational, and responsive practice. When teachers reflect systemically and engage in meaningful supervision, they become agents of transformation—not just in their classrooms, but across the whole school ecosystem.


Practical Tips for Systemic Reflection and Supervision

  • Use systems maps: Visualise how your role and those you supervise connect to others. Where in the system can you see opportunities/ constraints when supporting staff with ‘stuckness’? 
  • Ask systemic questions: What patterns am I part of? What stories are shaping this situation? Who else is affected by this problem? If this problem was not here
  • Create reflective teams: Share insights across phases/ departments or roles and build staff’s capacity to create multiple perspectives in a situation. This leads to creativity in solution finding.  
  • Design supervision for dialogue: Focus on meaning-making, not just performance.
  • Link wellbeing to systems: Reflect on how structures support or hinder your staff’s energy and purpose.

Supervision & Reflective Practice

TRAINING & SUPPORT FOR SCHOOLS

Are you looking to enhance the professional development of your staff? Our tailored training programme on supervision and reflective spaces will help educators thrive by improving their practice, fostering collaboration and promoting well-being.

What We Offer:

  • Wellbeing Focus – Foster a culture of support, reflection, and resilience within your school community.
  • Supervision Skills – Learn how to provide effective supervision that supports both individual and team development. 
  • Reflective Practice – Explore techniques for creating reflective spaces where staff can engage in deep learning and growth.

Package Details:

  • Training Duration: 
    2 days of in person training at the WPDC
    (23 Sept & 21 Oct 2025) 
  • Implementation support: 
    Access to group supervision
    (4 sessions of half-termly supervision 1.5 hrs in Nov 2025, Jan, Mar and May 2026) 
  • Cost: 
    £300 pp 
    (or £250 pp discounted price for two or more participants from each setting)
Categories
resource

Supporting Students with SEMH Needs

Students with Social, Emotional and Mental Health (SEMH) needs are among the most vulnerable in our school communities. They are disproportionately represented in exclusion statistics and their needs are often misunderstood.

When we take the time to listen to these students and promote their voice, we can uncover insightful strategies come from the students themselves. This article shares findings from a ‘Pupil Voice Project’ that captured the voices of 13 secondary students with SEMH needs, using participatory research methods and focus groups, across three secondary schools who shared what helps them thrive in school.

Their insights, grounded in psychological theory and best practice, can offer powerful and practical guidance for support.


Background


Research highlights students with SEMH needs struggle with trust, emotional regulation, and belonging. These challenges are often compounded in school systems. It is understandable that can teachers feel overwhelmed when faced with complex behaviour or emotional outbursts. But drawing on both psychological frameworks and the lived experiences and views of the students themselves, can support our understanding of supportive strategies.

Understanding Through Psychology

  • Attachment and Trauma-Informed Approaches 
    Many students with SEMH needs have experienced disrupted attachments or trauma. Feeling safe and seen at school is essential. Teachers can act as secure bases, building trust through consistency and relational approaches.

  • Self-Determination Theory 
    Autonomy, competence, and relatedness are key for motivation and wellbeing. When students feel they have choice, feel capable, and feel connected, they engage more. 

  • Ecological Systems Theory 
    SEMH support must be holistic, involving collaboration between school, families, and wider systems. Whole-school ethos matters just as much as individual interventions.

  • Pupil Voice in Practice 
    Despite their insights, pupils with SEMH needs are often the least heard. Yet research shows when we do listen, we uncover rich knowledge that improves practice and empowers students.

What Pupils Told Us (and What It Means for Practice):

1. Time for Relationships

“Teachers expect you to automatically trust them and tell them everything”

At the heart of effective support is a strong, trusting relationship. Pupils emphasised the importance of friendships for belonging, as well as adults taking time to understand them and the importance of mutual respect. Consistency, curiosity, and small gestures, like greeting students by name or checking in, can build the trust that’s essential for engagement.

2. Safe Spaces and Time to Regulate 

“When I have my head down, I don’t want to have a chat” 

“Take me out of lessons and talk to me”

Many students need time and space to process emotions and language. Quiet areas, sensory spaces, or simply being allowed to step out of class can help them regulate. These strategies should be seen as part of emotional support, not as rewards or avoidance.

3. Movement and Practical Strategies 

“Walking around helps”

Physical movement helps with concentration and regulation. Opportunities for movement breaks, physical activities, or alternative seating can support attention and behaviour. Simple tools like fidget items or access to clubs can also make a significant difference.

4. Individualised and Flexible Support 

“Giving more time to write stuff down”

Students value when their specific needs are recognised and accommodated. Adjustments like extra processing time, breaking down instructions, or use of assistive technology make learning more accessible.

5. Autonomy, Motivation and Choice 

Pupils want to feel a sense of control over their learning and school experience. Providing meaningful choices, such as where to sit, how to approach tasks, or selecting subjects, supports autonomy, self-esteem and engagement. Involving students in reward systems or goal setting can boost motivation.

6. Practical, Interactive Learning 

“Looking at a whiteboard all day doesn’t help”

Students with SEMH needs respond well to hands-on and real-life learning that connects with their interests and future aspirations. Group work, practical tasks, and use of technology were all valued.

7. Nurturing, Relational Approach

“We should be motivated and encouraged to do the right thing”

Students respond best when staff show empathy and seek to understand the roots of their behaviour rather than relying on punitive responses. Nurture-based approaches, emotional literacy support, and consistent encouragement help them make positive choices and feel safe to take risks in learning.

Conclusion.

The perspectives shared by the students align strongly with what research and psychology advocate for: relationships, trust, autonomy, flexibility, and a move toward relational, trauma-informed approaches, which are essential for meaningful engagement and wellbeing. When we listen to what the students tell us, we not only strengthen our practice, but we also empower young people to feel seen, valued, and capable of thriving in school.

Categories
Uncategorized

What Schools Are Saying About SCPS

Schools across Wandsworth consistently highlight the Schools and Community Psychology Service (SCPS) as a valued partner in supporting students, staff, and families. Feedback from 38 different schools across the borough underscores the breadth of our impact. We take pride in working collaboratively with schools, co-developing strategies, and providing expert guidance to help create the best possible outcomes for students.

We are encouraged to hear that our expertise, responsiveness, and commitment to collaborative working is helping schools navigate challenges and develop effective strategies.

Here’s some highlights from what schools have to say:

Expert Knowledge and Professionalism

We are recognised for our high level of expertise and collaborative approach, working alongside schools to provide essential insights and guidance.

“Highly knowledgeable and professional service, we are lucky to have this service in Wandsworth!”

Head Teacher
Alternative Provision

“Expert knowledge and expertise that differ from that of teaching staff/SENCO. Helpful for staff and parents to be able to understand a child’s needs better and therefore support them better.”

Inclusion Manager
Primary

As a fully staffed team with deep knowledge of Wandsworth’s diverse communities, we build lasting relationships with schools, offering tailored psychological support informed by local needs. The team also plays a vital role in key decision-making panels and forums, bridging local authority strategic planning with school-level implementation to help schools access additional resources and make the best use of existing support.

Collaborative Support for Schools and Staff

Schools value the opportunity to work closely with SCPS, benefitting from a supportive and reflective space to explore complex situations together.

“Having a calm voice and thoughtful presence to give us the space to talk through a difficult case – it can be difficult to find the time and not to feel as if you need to have all the answers (especially as a SENCo) and the EPs that I work with are great at providing that space and asking all the right questions!”

Inclusion Manager
Secondary

Our consultation model is built around working with schools, ensuring that all voices are heard and that strategies are co-developed for meaningful and lasting impact. Our approach is based on robust theoretical evidence and a commitment to understanding the child within their wider context. While it may take longer than a direct within-child assessment approach, this model provides a comprehensive and holistic view of a child’s needs. By taking the time to explore the systems around the child, we help schools develop sustainable and long-term solutions that benefit students, staff, and families alike.

Empowering Schools Through Training and Development

Training and professional development provided by SCPS equip school staff with the tools they need to better support students in a collaborative learning environment.

“Very supportive service for supporting staff to meet the needs of children through training and consultations which has supported staff in challenging situations.”

Inclusion Manager
Primary

“Great INSETs.”

Inclusion Manager
Primary

We are leaders in delivering training on trauma and relational approaches, ELSA, AME coaching, and other evidence-based strategies that support schools in meeting the needs of their most vulnerable students. The team also supports professional learning through monthly development sessions and opportunities to share expertise, ensuring that best practices are consistently refined and upheld.

Strong Communication and Responsiveness

Schools appreciate our clear and open communication, which supports effective collaboration and helps schools navigate complex processes with confidence.

Excellent communication, child-focused sessions.

Inclusion Manager
Primary

“Swift communication. All work is well planned and when deadlines are tight, SCPS always work to these deadlines.”

Inclusion Manager
Secondary

With strong relationships across Wandsworth schools, we work flexibly to provide timely and practical support when it’s needed most. The team’s size and diverse expertise allow for shared casework, ensuring that schools have access to a wide range of specialist knowledge and a collaborative approach to problem-solving.

High-Quality Assessments and Reports

Our assessments and reports are recognised for their depth and clarity, helping schools and families better understand students’ needs and access the right support.

The EP reports are invaluable when applying for EHCNAs.

Inclusion Manager
Primary

“Assessments are thorough and helpful and the EP is personable and efficient. Parents like him.”

Inclusion Manager
Primary

The team’s capacity to hold both pre-statutory and statutory work ensures a deep understanding of casework and provision, providing continuity for families and informed recommendations for schools.

Partnerships with Families and Multi-Agency Working

We work closely with schools, families, and other services to ensure a joined-up approach to student support, helping to navigate challenging conversations with care and expertise.

“EP having difficult conversations with parents to help them understand in a supportive way.”

Inclusion Manager
Primary

“Working in partnership with families, class teams and pupils. Advice and support on a myriad of issues that come with working in a school with a resources base and pupils in mainstream with high needs.”

Inclusion Manager
Primary

With direct links to Wandsworth Council, NHS teams, and key national networks, we are well-positioned to provide informed, system-wide guidance that enhances school support structures. The team is also a leading example in anti-racist practice, helping other local authority teams build confidence in this crucial area.

Flexibility and Innovation

Schools appreciate our adaptable and solutions-focused approach, working in partnership to develop strategies that fit their unique contexts.

“EPs open to new and innovative ways of working with the school and their decreasing budgets.”

Inclusion Manager
Primary

“Flexibility and calm approach to problem-solving!”

Inclusion Manager
Primary

With a large, well-connected team, we remain responsive to the evolving needs of schools, ensuring support is both effective and sustainable. Each EP is allocated a variety of early years, primary, secondary, and specialist schools, allowing for a broad familiarity with different educational settings while also encouraging team members to develop deeper areas of expertise.

Categories
resource

Conversations for student behaviour change

Supporting students with behaviour change 

As teachers, teaching assistants, pastoral leads, or school leaders, you will likely have encountered students presenting with low motivation and engagement, or behaviours that feel challenging. Whether you are seeking to support a student to reduce disruptive behaviour, engage with lessons or improve their attendance, these difficult conversations can sometimes feel frustrating and unproductive. 

So, how do you engage with these students in a positive and productive way, that leads to desired behaviour change? How do you do this without damaging your relationship? 

Motivational Interviewing (MI) offers a practical and evidence-based conversational approach that can help unlock a young person’s potential for change whilst maintaining mutual trust and respect.

What is Motivational Interviewing?

Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a collaborative, person-centred approach to communication that helps individuals explore their own thoughts and feelings about change. 

MI was originally developed in healthcare and it is being increasingly used in schools. There is research evidence that using MI-informed approaches with students can improve: behaviour, academic motivation, attendance, punctuality, independence, effort, task completion, confidence and reduced disciplinary incidents. 

Instead of relying on external rewards and sanctions, MI uses a guiding style to support the young person to think of their own motivation for change, set their own goals and feel empowered to achieve them. MI can be particularly effective for pupils who might be reluctant or unsure about making changes. 

The beauty of MI is that it can be used flexibly in your everyday conversations and a lot can be achieved in 5-10 minutes.

How to apply MI in your conversations  

To create meaningful, respectful, student-centred conversations that foster positive behaviour change, you need to embody the ‘spirit’ of MI, which uses the acronym ‘PACE’. It stands for Partnership, Acceptance, Compassion, and Evocation.

1. Partnership: Working together

Partnership emphasises collaboration rather than authority, ensuring that the student feels involved in the conversation.

Scenario: A student has been disrupting class and isn’t engaging with their work.

“I noticed that you’ve been finding it tough to stay focused during lessons. Can we figure out together what’s making it tricky and how we can make things feel easier for you?”

 “I just don’t get what’s going on in class, so I get bored.”

“That makes sense. When the work feels confusing, it’s hard to stay motivated. What do you think would help us make the lessons clearer for you?”

By using collaborative language (“Can we figure out together?”), the staff member avoids blame and invites the student into the problem-solving process.

2. Acceptance: Valuing the student’s perspective

Acceptance involves recognising and respecting the student’s feelings, experiences, and autonomy. We may need to set aside our own thoughts and feelings about their behaviour, in order to show non-judgement and acceptance. 

Scenario: A student is repeatedly late to school.

I’ve noticed you’ve been arriving late recently. I just want to understand how things are for you in the mornings—what’s been going on?

“It’s just hard to get up. I’m tired, and sometimes I just don’t care.”

“It sounds like mornings have been a real struggle for you, and getting out of bed doesn’t feel worth it right now.”

“Yeah, exactly.”

“Thanks for sharing that—it’s not easy to admit when you’re finding things tough. What might make mornings feel more manageable for you?”

By reflecting the student’s feelings without judgment (“It sounds like mornings have been a real struggle”), the staff member creates a safe space for the student to open up.

3. Compassion: Prioritising the student’s well-being

Compassion means showing empathy, understanding and genuine care for the student’s challenges. When we feel compassion, we feel compelled to help. We try to see things from the student’s perspective and offer support, rather than adopting punitive approaches, such as reprimanding or giving sanctions. 

Scenario: A student is reluctant to participate in group work and often withdraws.

“I’ve noticed you tend to keep to yourself during group activities. I just want to check in—how do you feel about working with others?”

 “I don’t like it. I feel like no one listens to me.”

“That sounds frustrating. It’s important to feel like your voice matters. What do you think would help you feel more comfortable in group work?”

“I guess if I was with people who don’t talk over me.”

“That’s a good point. Let’s work together to find a group where you feel more respected—it’s important that you feel part of the team.”

By focusing on the student’s emotional experience (“It’s important to feel like your voice matters”), the staff member shows compassion and prioritises their well-being.

4. Empowerment: Building confidence in change

Empowerment involves fostering the student’s belief in their ability to take meaningful action and make positive changes. Empowerment is about building confidence and strengthening the young person’s own motivation to change. 

Scenario: A student frequently forgets to complete their homework and is falling behind.

“I noticed you’ve had a tough time keeping up with homework lately. What’s been making it hard to get it done?”

“I just forget about it until it’s too late.”

“That happens to a lot of people—especially when there’s so much else going on. When you do remember to finish it, what helps you stay on top of things?”

“If I write it down, I usually remember.”

“That’s a great strategy! You’ve already shown you can keep track when you write it down. How could we make that even more reliable for you?”

By focusing on the student’s past successes (“You’ve already shown you can keep track when you write it down”), the staff member builds the student’s confidence and empowers them to feel capable of taking the next steps.

Why Does MI Work?

Motivational Interviewing works because it shifts the role of the staff member from a ‘fixer’ to a ‘guide’. Instead of telling a young person what they ‘should’ do, you’re helping them discover their own reasons for change. This approach reduces defensiveness and resistance and increases the likelihood of genuine, long-lasting change.

Final Thoughts

Using MI principles in school doesn’t mean adding another ‘to-do’ to your busy day. Instead, it’s about changing the way you approach conversations with pupils—asking open-ended questions, listening deeply, and helping them recognise their strengths and motivations. Whether you’re a teacher supporting a student with attendance, or a pastoral lead addressing behaviour concerns, small shifts in how you communicate can make a big difference.

Next Steps 

You can start by trying these strategies in your next conversation with a pupil. You might be surprised at how much more open and motivated they become when they feel heard, understood, and supported. You may well already be doing this skilfully. 

At present, every secondary school in Wandsworth is working with SCPS to train an ‘AME Coach’ to use MI-based approaches with young people to enhance their motivation and engagement related to education, employment and future aspirations. (AME stands for autonomy, motivation and engagement.) For more information, contact us>>

Categories
resource

Emotion Coaching

What is Emotion Coaching?

  • A method to help children understand and manage their emotions.
  • Supports the development of emotional intelligence.
  • The concept of emotion coaching was developed by Dr John Gottman. His work emphasizes the importance of parents and caregivers in helping children understand and manage their emotions, effectively. 

Benefits:

  • It helps create nurturing relationships, develop capacities to promote emotional and behavioural self-regulation and support pro-social behaviours.
  • It can harness wellbeing through improved communication, relationships, self-regulation, attainment, health, and resilience.

Emotion coaching involves several key steps to help children understand and manage their emotions effectively:

  1. Become Aware of the Child’s Emotions
    Notice the child’s emotional signals, such as facial expressions, body language, and tone of voice. Be present and attentive to their emotional state.
  2. Recognise the Emotion as an Opportunity for Connection
    View emotional moments as chances to connect with the child, rather than as problems to be solved quickly. Show that you understand and care about what the child is feeling.
  3. Listen to the Child with Empathy
    Give the child your full attention and reflect back what you hear to show understanding. Let them express their feelings without criticism or interruption.
  4. Label the Emotion
    Encourage the child to put a name to their emotions (e.g. I notice that… I was wondering if you are feeling... ). Teach them various words to describe their feelings.
  5. Set Limits While Supporting Problem Solving
    All emotions are acceptable, but not all behaviours are. Help the child find constructive ways to cope with their emotions and the situation. Encourage them to brainstorm solutions and make choices about how to handle their feelings.

View our full presentation for top tips and techniques:

Categories
resource

Understanding Self-Harm

What is self-harm?

Self-harm is a behaviour that is done to deliberately harm oneself. Self-harm is more commonly used as a way of managing difficult emotions, by helping to regulate intense feelings.

The Addictive Model of Self-Harming Behaviour (Non-Suicidal and Suicidal) 

How do I talk about self-harm?

Talking about self-harm can feel hard and create difficult feelings and worries. Research tells us that talking about self-harm does not put the idea into their head. In fact, it creates a safe space for them to be open and honest about how they feel and provide them with a safe person to turn to.

To do this, you should:

  • Provide a safe and confidential space/environment.
  • Listen and explain the limits to confidentiality.
  • Reassure the child or young person that their feelings are important and valid, and it may help to talk about them.
  • Tell the young person how courageous they are to be talking about difficult thoughts and feelings.
  • Stay calm and always provide an empathic and non-judgemental approach. 
  • Use the https://www.richmond.gov.uk/portus/files/professionals-risk-assessment.pdf to help you understand the context of the behaviour and to help you make an informed decision about next steps.
  • Check in with them regularly to make sure the support offered is making a difference.

What questions could I ask?

  • How are things for you right now?
  • Can you say what’s bothering you? 
  • What might help you? 
  • What would you like to happen next?

How do I respond to self-harm?

If you have serious and immediate concerns regarding the safety or a child or young person due to self-harm or suicidal ideation, contact the emergency services on 999 or the Mental Health Trust 24/7 crisis line on 080 0028 800.

Refer to the Self-Harm and Suicide Prevention Pathway to help you and your colleagues to make decisions about the support required: Children and Young People’s Self-harm and Suicide Prevention Pathway.

It is important to ensure parent’s and carer’s are involved in this process unless there are safeguarding concerns relating to the young person’s family. 

As young people should be attending an educational setting on a regular basis, schools and colleges are also well placed to support anyone who is facing emotional distress.

Are they at risk of suicide?

While self-harm is relatively common in young people, suicide is rare. Although some people who self-harm may experience suicidal thoughts, this is often not the case. Suicides are uncommon in childhood and early adolescence, but risk increases in the late teens and continues to rise into early adulthood.

The following steps can help you find out if a child or young person is thinking about suicide. 

Ask directly.
Use the word suicide. ‘Are you thinking about suicide?’ Practice asking first if this helps. It may give you more confidence.

Stay calm.
This is important as the child or young person may be looking at how you react to decide how much they should tell you.

If you are unsure of how to start the conversation, contact the Papyrus helpline HOPELINEUK on 0800 068 4141. Papyrus’ specially trained advisers can talk you through what to say and how to support the child or young person during this conversation. 

Talking with a child or young person about suicide can be very difficult. If you need support following your conversation, Papyrus’ advisers are on hand to de-brief with you and help you to process what has been said and where to go next.

If the child or young person says that they have had, or are currently experiencing, suicidal thoughts, you should create a personalised plan to help keep them safe: Suicide Prevention Support and Safety Plan.

Additional resources